Friday, April 15, 2011

"New Decade. New Rules." - Scream 4


It's a new installment to the Scream series, which means: Some New Rules for the New Millennium. Here are, in my humble movie-viewing opinion, some of the new rules of the horror movie genre:

  1. Then: anyone can be the killer. Now: anyone can be the victim. (Even the main character can sacrifice him/herself.)
  2. Archetypal stereotypes are out, body counts are in. Killers need to keep their body-count numbers up
  3. Yup, that means virgins can die.
  4. Body-counts and complexity level of the kill will always rise with each installment.
  5. On the bright side, the rest of those pesky archetypal constraints of last century are totally non sequitur- African Americans, ugly people, hotties, Asians, drug dealers, and addicts all can actually survive.
  6. In order to survive, you must gain something valuable from the experience.
  7. To survive, don’t dilly-dally, chances are you’re being timed.
  8. You’ll be strapped down. If you cry… you die.
  9. To survive, assess the situation immediately and don’t spend all that time “coming to.” (Really, all of this could have been avoided if you just grabbed that key in the beginning before it went down the drain.)
  10. Don’t check your cell phone; you won’t have a signal and it’s a death wish.
  11. Don’t expect a chase sequence. This is the new lazy America, expect to be kidnapped or drugged in a quick, clean, efficient manner.
  12. Even more lazy- Killers don’t get their hands dirty… It's ok to rely on an indoctrinated minion, desperate hostage or even a god damn puppet-thing on a bike (ps- multiple killers are no longer a surprise).
  13. Even MORE lazy- Killer abdicates responsibility. They will control your choices by putting the victim’s life in your hands (“See little Sue on the monitor… she will die if you don’t make me a sand which now”).
  14. Surgical tools, technology/machines are the new ax and chainsaw.
  15. The cleaner and more efficient the kidnapping is, the more tense, rusty, highly inefficient your death will be.
  16. Expect extreme death. Unstoppable contraptions and slow mutilating torture will be your demise now (really makes you long for the quick stab to the heart).
  17. Made in the USA- Though everything is rusted through and compiled from a garbage dump with no obvious fuel source, the duct tape and Elmer’s glue will hold… These mechanisms aren’t going to fail or fall apart. Sorry.
  18. Despite being incredibly complex, these mechanisms don’t require a high-level degree in engineering, physics or construction… it can easily be done by some handicapped janitor.
  19. EVERYTHING is being recorded. Despite no power outlets or connections you ARE being watched.
  20. If it’s a remake- old rules apply. Remember guys, the original was always better.

Friday, October 15, 2010

Top 10+ Activists Caught Being Gay:

Here is a short (and recent) list of anit-gay gay leaders. The ones who vote against gay legal rights, marriage, simple anit-bulling laws for children, and even adoption rights. These are the "wicked witches of the westvillege." ;-)

In the list are:

  • George Rekers
  • Pastor Eddie Long
  • Troy King
  • Richard Curtis
  • Ted Haggard
  • Glenn Murphy Jr.
  • David Dreier
  • Bruce Barclay
  • Roy Ashburn
  • Jim West
  • Larry Craig
  • Ed Schrock
  • Robert Allen
  • Mark Foley

Check it out here: http://www.ranker.com/list/top-10-anti-gay-activists-caught-being-gay/joanne?page=1&format=blogstyle_view

But it totally miss some of the others like Bush Campaign Manager Ken Mehlman, the handful of Ronald Reagan's gay advisors, Michael Bussee and Gary Cooper who worked in Exodus Gay Elimination (and left each other's wives to run away together), along with fellow former Exodus leaders Jeremy Marks and Darlene Bogle, each outted as gay or lesbian. Also, Focus on the Family's John Paulk, a well-known "ex-gay" public figure and Chairman of Exodus International, was removed by Exodus International Board of Directors due to his constant sex with other men. Washington's Spokane Mayor James West (R) an opponent of gay rights, went to court for accusations of having molested two boys while he was a sheriff's deputy and Boy Scout leader and came under investigation (2005) for offering municipal jobs to men he met in gay online chat rooms, or Republican Jeff Gannon admitted to being a $200/day gay prostitute in 2005. What about the men and women who would eat their own young-- like Dick Cheney who's daughter is gay, or Ronald Regan who's son is gay.

ESPN/CNN writer, LZ Granderson, had a wonderful article on this topic called: Closeted anti-gays are the enemy within.

"The gay and lesbian community has plenty of Uncle Toms trying to blow us up from inside, but what we don't have is our own word or phrase to identify them. Some call them "closet cases," but there is a difference between someone who is unwilling to live openly and honestly, and someone who takes that a step further and hurts those who do [...] People like Rekers, a Baptist minister who was paid to testify against gay adoption and travel the globe preaching that therapy can "cure" gay people, do not deserve the same sympathy given to those who are afraid of losing their jobs. Not when they consciously morph from being victims of homophobia to attack dogs eating their young."

Friday, February 12, 2010

Let's Look at the Resemblance: One Nation's Marriage Based in Bible

There is a bill pending in the Bahamas which would outlaw marital rape, and it is facing a lot of opposition. There is a common theme in the arguments against it: see if you can figure out what it is.

"It is ridiculous for them to try to make that a law, because I don't think a man can rape his own wife. After two people get married, the Bible says that they become one - one flesh. How is it possible to rape what is yours?" asked Mr. Sutherland.

"Even if a woman says no to her husband it still can't be considered rape because she is his wife. He already paid his dues at the church and she already said 'I do,' so from then on, even if [a man] forces sex on his wife, it isn't rape," he said.

"I disagree with the bill because I disagree that a man can rape his wife. The Bible tells me that a man's body is his wife's and her body is his. How could he rape her?" asked Ms. Sweeting.

It looks to me as if being brought up with a belief in the literal truth of a misogynistic document like the Bible can inculcate the evil idea that women are possessions, and that marriage is an act of handing over a woman's bill of sale to a man. I thought a wife was a partner, not a slave.

Tuesday, February 02, 2010

Popular Poetry, Pantomime


Pantomime
Marcus Lane

Don't cry, this kiss is a kiss goodbye.
Don't cling, it's time to part.
Don't look at me nor ask me why
I've taken back my heart.

No questioning, no pleading;
No door remains ajar.
No doubt your heart is bleeding,
Deep wounds will leave a scar.

Don't hope to ever turn back time,
Nor resurrect the flame
Of what's become a pantomime
Of love, in all but name.

Friday, January 29, 2010

Thursday, January 28, 2010

Hilarious Breaking Story on Yahoo! Homepage Today

Today, I had the pleasure of logging into Yahoo!’s Homepage and seeing a comical “news article” as the main headline. Littered with grammatical errors, erroneous journalism tactics, unabashed opinions and, most of all, hilariously inappropriate innuendo.

Let me start with the author's choice word in the title. Within the bold, size 15 font in the actual title- “gropes” right next the Presidents picture. "Reality Check: President Gropes." That is an extreme word with strong sexual and violent connotations not usually attributed to our nations first black President, so I read on.

But wait! There is more than just synonms for rape, there's also "erogenous zones." Yes, it gets better, following the groping with this sentence: “touching every political erogenous zone he and his advisers can think of...” Hahaha, are you serious! "touching" ha! But there is more...

And then the writer follows that up with “inescapable that his 69-minute speech” …wait, what? Generally, with time measurement and in proper grammar once it reaches past 60 mins you attribute that to 1 hour. I mean no one would say: his 4,140 second speech. It should say 1:06 mins. But 69! So, I guess there is an exception when the number can be added up to equal a popular sex move. (And to be exact it was actually 1:09:44.)


There is more, the writer then took full advantage of the term “bang.” “talk then was of a presidential big bang.” And continues to loosely use bang for the rest of the article. "With the banging..."

And then winds down to his final thought... something about “revealed in real-time a president groping.”

Ha ha ha ha hahahaha. WHAT KIND OF CRAP IS THIS. This is the top story! Let me remind you Yahoo! receives 477 million unique monthly visitors. The story is from Politco, a blog. Generally, I don’t mind bloggers having fun, or expressing opinion or breaking their “journalistic integrity” but that’s because Blogs stay in the realm of Blogs, all while The Associated Press and Reuters stay in the realm of information and newsfeeds.

What, the AP, Reuters, International Herald, NY Times, or Washington Post didn’t have a story on the President’s freakin’ State of the Union address! What a piece of crap journalism editing. I am not sure what is wrong with Yahoo!’s New Editorial Team, or if there is one, but I find it irresponsible and reprehensible to professionally report a blog (though fine it its own realm) as a main source for news information. Sure, this story was hilarious as shit, but wildly unprofessional and given as fact for millions of consumers. No integrity.

As for John F. Harris, he ended his piece with “In many ways his tone belittled the speech’s substance.” Your tone, sir, belittle your entire writing capability.

Check it out for yourself- http://news.yahoo.com/s/politico/20100128/pl_politico/32143

Friday, January 22, 2010

Obama Rank: Promise Kept or Change Achieved?


THIS IS GREAT!!!! Politifact has been counting up Obama’s post-election success and pre-election promises. I have been trying to do the same… but this guy was far more successful- stupid office work, family, social life and boyfriend getting in the way of my obsession of tracking and measuring... things and stuff. Check our this amazing Obamameter from the St. Petersburg Times newspaper: http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/promises/

"PolitiFact has compiled more than 500 promises that Barack Obama made during the campaign and is tracking their progress on our Obameter."
The pole contrasts Promises Kept, Compromised, Promises Broken, Stalled, In the Works. There are a few pieces I would like to point out, firstly that it has only been one year since taking the oath and I cant seem to remember any other president that has received such unprecedented attention for only a single year in office, perhaps it is because of my second point. 2- These are some massive issue and yes, that is probably why so many are so impatient and are receiving a lot of attention thus for only one year I can understand where “In the Works” is an important measurement for meter. Thirdly, I take issue with the term “Compromised” as its own singular force. I would like to remind everyone of his initial promise to reach across the aisle and:
“A good compromise, a good piece of legislation, is like a good sentence; or a good piece of music. Everybody can recognize it. They say, 'Huh. It works. It makes sense.”

“I think that there's a tradition of us working together to make sure that we are dealing with the threats that are out there and that we are building a consensus here in the United States. That's the kind of approach I intend to take when I'm president of the United States.”
With all this, allow the numbers still speak for themselves- do the math and add it up, 124 accomplishments, 276 working towards and 16 lost of about 505.

I wish this was on Stumble, or trending topics, or even Digg. But I don’t think people are as excited NOR really want to be informed. From what I have experienced (regardless of the facts) if people like him- he has kept his promises, if people don’t like him- then he just hasn’t. Not much middle ground, not much fact-base, not much anything beyond “well, I feel that he has…..” But that’s why I want people to really look at it.

Get informed and inform others.



Wednesday, January 20, 2010

Why Fox News is good for Liberals- Part 2


In my previous blog- http://ufornography.blogspot.com/2010/01/why-is-fox-news-good-if-youre-liberal.html - I discussed why this biased, poorly researched, (and hugely unprofessional) news channel is detrimental for the Republican movement in this country. In this blog I would like to take a proactive focus on how this channel can be used to help Liberals, and how Democrats can effectively use Fox New's irrationality.

As proposed in the last blog, the news channel has a clear bias and right-friendly reporting, and it has arguably become a mouth of the Republican Party. This is the source where they can get there slogans, endorsements, and facts on which they build their platform. This is practically a selective conservative news feed… which can be controlled.

They are still a news service thus always need new stories and they can be directed to one story or another through ratings, advertiser tactics, clever agenda setting methods and misdirection.

Let’s just say for an upcoming 2016 election, a leader says how “democrats have failed in the agriculture issue” or create a scandal in Dept of Ag. That is setting the agenda. Fox News will jump on it faster than Hillary can jumps in a pantsuit. They will talk to the American people about the importance of our countries agriculture, run specials on Mid west farmers who demand a candidate understanding of agriculture, and promote the issue onto the forefront of viewers minds with repetitive catchy messages and buzz words.
Then, unveil the Democrat's waiting candidates-- the agriculturally-primed, farmer-ready, rural background democrat nominee that has served on every agricultural development board and powerful crop cultivation committee. Yes, this selection of Midwest Democrats that have been being prepped waiting until this moment when “all of America cries out to its farmers.” So suddenly, there is an ideal candidate with all the answers, experience and all the perfect talking points. All for the issue that has been on the forefront of the American’s minds. Score 1 for Dems.

My advice to Dem- Don’t view the News entity as an enemy and keep you distance… bate the mouse trap.

Create the perfect candidate: Before the 2016 post-Obama presidential election, an event surely marred with "liberal foreign policy" and "educated elitism of the world." Find a governor with speaking appeal like Brian Schweitzer, from Montana, opposes gun control, has that "all American leader" quality and has improved the job market in his state. Over the next 6 years promote him to serve as head to many agricultural committees to find employment committees for blue collar workers and have him take a hard stance against gun control. Make him appear to be expert in the field for national topics, not international.
During the second term Pres. Obama can illude to weakness in domestic policies, or say “some say Dems are weak with the issues facing farmers… but that just isn’t true” (egging Fox on) and have an official say they “just don’t understand middle America and gun rights.” Fox will be quick to pick this up and run with it-- “our candidates need to understand gun control policy, have a history or strong employment, and recognize the constutional rights" ... "We need a leader who knows rural American, not from the city.” Create a cultural awareness get people talking, and then bring out Schwieitzer, with impeccable credentials, extensive experience and the perfect choice for the American people.

You can take it one step further with a “Bate and Switch.” Find specific critiques Americans have, and create a solid strategy for it while you bait the Republicans to follow another issue. Much like financial woes and gas prices in the last election. Then set the agenda about Democrats inability to handle a completely different issue like airport security (one that isn’t really a make or brake issue to most voters). --Get the conservatives to focus in on this issue for the election year. They will be happy to point out the cracks in the party’s platform, get them to focus on those trivial facts... obsess on this issue... and let Fox News bombard republicans with that issue. Conservatives pick a team of security minded candidates and build their platform on this irrelevant issue. Liberals pick candidates on a more centrist platform with a financial understanding, and promises of gasoline tax breaks. This basic issues more appealing to general Americans concerns and America will respond.

This is similar to what happened in the 2008 elections. People were talking about war and people were talking about the first woman president. So the republicans got a veteran, and (to attempt to appease female voters) hastily included the ill-prepared Mrs. Palin. But soon the Economy went right into the limelight and McCain couldn’t have been more out of touch.

So remember, agenda setting—it’s important...


How does Obama "Stack Up"? ...Or is that even the right question?

This Is SO IMPORTANT. As the anniversary of President Barack Obama's Inauguration arrives, Jeffrey Brown speaks with a panel of experts about how the president has performed thus far in the Oval Office. WATCH this PBS News video, it is slow for the first few seconds but picks up quickly. The in-studio guests have wonderful incite and solid points of view.



Beware of historical analogies when it comes to politics, your best bet is to keep a keen eye and informed mind. But one quote I would like to end on, and it is a very important one in the midst of this extreme-hyper-partisan and individual-totalitarian-voting era:
"the question isn't is our government too small or too large, but rather- does our government work?"
What a wonderful moderate quote.

Tuesday, January 19, 2010

The Rise of Fringe Movements

As further proof of the remarkable political changes taking place in the conservative movement, NPR touched on the power of the Tea Party. I mentioned this in the last blog about Fox News and how they helped this party gain mass recognition and more control. I would like to further back up my point with the story named “7 Things At Stake In Massachusetts” and the prevailing attention this party is getting:
“As he put the final touches on his Inauguration Day address, President Obama could scarcely have imagined that one year later, his agenda and his presidency would hang on the outcome of a cliffhanging special election in Massachusetts.
But that is the message this morning from Boston to Washington and in the news media everywhere. To take the coverage at face value, the president will be staying up late tonight to see whether it's worth coming to work tomorrow.
Number 6 on the NPR list-
The momentum of the Tea Party: Dismissed as a fringe phenomenon in the spring of 2009, the anti-tax Tea movement gained great visibility in a series of marches against the stimulus, the health care bill and the Washington of Obama in general. The party claimed at least partial credit for overthrowing Democratic regimes in New Jersey and Virginia in the fall. Frustrated in a special House race in upstate New York, the party has turned with renewed vigor to its crusade in the Commonwealth, pumping money and energy into the late phase of the campaign. And a win in Massachusetts would be the perfect set-up for the Tea movement's planned convention in Nashville in early February. Think there's any chance a newly minted Sen. Brown would be there?”

For more on this great story click here:
http://www.npr.org/watchingwashington/2010/01/seven_things_at_stake_in_brown.html

As for the MA election… I just can't get myself to say it. I just can’t. Though I don’t think it is 100% that a republican will win, it is important to take into account that there is a major push from out of state support (from Tea partiers, conservative, anti-health care movement… The people in CA know how powerful out of state funding can be). Secondly, Rep. Scott has smoothly transitioned to a more moderate stance, while Coakley, never a strong candidate, has been complacent and lacks some community roots. Thirdly, remember the MA people in this “liberal paradise” just voted out gay marriage… its not as sure fire as one would think for Dems. They have JUST successfully ran this conservative initiative there and can do it again, but this time for the super majority in the house. Oh I really hope my political gut is wrong for once on this.

http://my.barackobama.com/page/content/magotvFB/

Monday, January 18, 2010

Why is Fox News Good if You're a Liberal? Pt. 1

This is why…
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/10/magazine/10florida-t.html?ref=magazine

Yes, splinter movements. Republicans can lose there conservative voters to small groups and the party itself begins lose its identity.


These other parties will start to undercut the Republican base attracting more extreme people to these momentous fringe parties. We all saw what Nader did to the Democrats and what Ross Perot did to the Republicans. This news channel can over inflate confidence in these right fringe movements and unintentionally take away from a conservative base. When they begin to highlight many types of right extremes and no left groups, then all these right groups (with different agendas/terms/ideas) begin to take hold. They are all getting air time, all get rallies and are all after the same conservative base. For Dems, its simply a matter of “divide and conquer.” Republican leaders, supporters, libertarians and tea partiers are not friends—they are competitors. Its a single unified Democrat party going against a separated community.

Fox News doesn’t just stand to deteriorate conservative unity, it also has greatly alienated their base party, the Republicans. Fox has done a superb job of making one view look like everyone’s view. The station is geared to a right-wing audience and is equipped with slanted statistics, biased commentary and selective news exposure. If you were to watch Fox News for a week you could easily believe the Republicans should be ruling the world and the only people with the capacity to do so. And its that assumption and false confidence in an audience that isn’t there (adding 100,000+ supports to small rallies) that you begin to lose site of an effect message and strong leaders. In short you wind up with examples of over inflated confidence like this… A Republican "Purity Test" that violates moderates, undecided voters and people in your own pary (http://blogcritics.org/politics/article/a-republican-purity-test-mdash-a/).

Appealing to moderates and listening to American critiques is how the Democrats easily won the 2008 election. If every message is the best message, how do you find the most effective one? If every leader is the best leader, how do you weed out the weakest? If every conservative movement has 100,000+ supporters at their rallies, which one will garner the most actual support at the voting booth?

Criticism is good and constructive, make sure you listen to it. Republicans are being lied to and are ill prepared. They are navigate through a thick fog of false confidence, skewed numbers, poor leadership and inaccurate support.



Lack of "unpleasant truth" is something that many leaders had, and it is to their detriment.
Hitler, Stalin, and countless other dictators eventually came to live in fantasy worlds, which were finally shattered only by some reality-based event like a military invasion or revolution. One common aspect of nearly all dictatorships is that their leaders come to believe the "reports" of their own propaganda machines, namely, that the masses are happy, even if in reality they are desperate. Stalin, for example, believed his "Socialist Realism" films that depicted happy peasants singing in the fields, even though actual peasants were resorting to cannibalism trying to survive the man-made famine [caused when fearful underlings misinformation about the lagging productivity of the nations agriculture].
Make sure to look at the "Dictators receive little accurate information," under the Dictatorship header, to show how inaccurate information is a killer to your party, here: http://www.huppi.com/kangaroo/L-PowerDistribution.html

For Part 2, click here http://ufornography.blogspot.com/2010/01/why-fox-news-is-good-for-liberals-part.html

Timeless Ideologies of MLK









Friday, January 15, 2010

This Just In: Pat Robertson... Crazy LONG Before Haiti's Earthquake

From Twitter:
Pat Robertson: Haiti Needs Help, Not Stupidity
Pat Robertson... That is not God talking to you, that is Alzheimer's disease.
Rush Limbaugh and Pat Robertson should be put in chains and forced to work in Haiti
Call Pat Robertson 700 Club (800)759-0700 reply 2 his comments abt Haiti. Costs them $1 4 each 800 call.
There's a special room in hell being prepared for Pat Robertson and Rush Limbaugh.
Pat Robertson, why is your god so lazy? Surely he could have smited (smoten?) the Haitians earlier than 219 years later
Jon Stewart shows Pat Robertson how to be a better Christian.


Top Robertson Gaffes










VIEW MORE AT: http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,1953778_1953776,00.html

Wednesday, December 09, 2009

Quote from Daily Kos-

Here is some behavioral semantics to invoke powerful political responces, just guess you they are in relation too...

  • A "Homeland" and all the imagery connected to it (also prominently featured in patriotic songs) Invocation of patriotism, of which there is supposedly never enough
  • Glorification of the military while regarding actual soldiers as disposable
  • Glorification of motherhood with ulterior motives (the Lebensborn movement got started with homes for unwed mothers to prevent abortions)
  • "We" are the good guys, not because of what we do (or don't do) but because we say so - "We" are superior at anything and everything, again because we say so
  • Discrimination against a particular minority is morally justified to preserve national security
  • Even though racism and gender discrimination are considered morally right, ideology supersedes racial, ethnic, or gender affiliation. Minority members are tolerated ("We decide who's a Jew") and women can have careers if they are useful to the party
  • A crime or injustice was committed against us, so we must punish somebody, whether they had anything to do with it or not
  • If we lose a war, it's the left-wing traitors' fault
  • Everybody else is out to get us, and we must get them first - Messed up grammar and nonsensical sentence structures interrupted by bumper sticker-style slogans.

...Fox News.

Tuesday, November 24, 2009

Wednesday, September 09, 2009

One of my all time favorit movie is getting a part 2

...And I think I already hate it. This is one of my beloved personal classics. Its philosophical, entertaining, funny, shocking, well written and impeccably acted. This second installment looks seriously lame, they got rid of 2 of the most pimp characters and replaced one of with some chick who visibly does not have the acting chops for the role. Even in the selected scenes for the trailer she lacks the intensity of others and seems to do more imitating (poorly) than acting. And she's not that hot, not that it really matters. The film itself looks glossy and immature, like another shitty Crank sequel. Have a sad and tortured look for yourself:



I mean who really watched this taint-linking, scrod-infested, shit-piece:

Wednesday, August 19, 2009

I am not saying I am for Universal Health Care But...

You didn't get mad when the Supreme Court stopped a legal recount and appointed a President.

You didn't get mad when Cheney allowed Energy company officials to dictate their own energy policy.

You didn't get mad when a covert CIA operative got outed and our own government allowed a leak.

You didn't get mad when the Patriot Act got passed.

You didn't get mad when we put our servicemen and women in harm and illegally invaded a country that posed no threat to us.

You didn't get mad when we spent over 600 billion(and counting) on said illegal war.

You didn't get mad when over 10 billion dollars just disappeared in Iraq.

You didn't get mad when you saw the Abu Grahib photos.

You didn't get mad when you found out we were torturing people.

You didn't get mad when the government was illegally wiretapping us and violating Americans.

You didn't get mad when we didn't catch Bin Laden.

You didn't get mad when you saw the horrible conditions at Walter Reed.

You didn't get mad when we let a major US city drown.

You didn't get mad when the deficit hit the trillion dollar mark.

You finally got mad when.. when... wait for it... when the government decided that people in America deserved to see a doctor if they are sick. That they will ends Discrimination for Pre-Existing Conditions. That they will end how much you can legally charge for out of pocket expenses, or ends Dropping of Coverage for Seriously Ill and ends your Lifetime Cap. Yes, illegal wars, lies, corruption, torture, stealing your tax dollars to make the rich richer, are all ok with you but helping other Americans... well fuck that. That about right? You know it is.

You people have all lost your fucking minds. You are selfish, greedy, obnoxious, narcissistic, and frankly... stupid. Your pathetic little misspelled protest signs are embarrassing. Maybe you ought to find the smart person in your midst and let them make up all the signs, cause man, you look like a bunch of idiots. Also you're ugly and your mother dresses you funny.

Wednesday, July 29, 2009

For Those 25 And Over

I fond this on another blog: If you have reached the age of 25, I have a bit of bad news for you: it is time, if you have not already done so, for you to emerge from your cocoon of post-adolescent dithering and self-absorption and join the rest of us in the world. Past the quarter-century mark, you see, certain actions, attitudes, and behaviors will simply no longer do, and while it might seem unpleasant to feign a maturity and solicitousness towards others that you may not genuinely feel, it is not only appreciated by others but necessary for your continued survival. Continuing to insist past that point that good manners, thoughtfulness, and grooming oppress you in some way is inappropriate and irritating.

Grow up.

And when I instruct you to grow up, I do not mean that you must read up on mortgage rates, put aside candy necklaces, or desist from substituting the word "poo" for crucial syllables of movie titles. Silliness is not only still permitted but actively encouraged. You must, however, stop viewing carelessness, tardiness, helplessness, or any other quality better suited to a child as either charming or somehow beyond your control. A certain grace period for the development of basic consideration and self-sufficiency is assumed, but once you have turned 25, the grace period is over, and starring in a film in your head in which you walk the earth alone is no longer considered a valid lifestyle choice, but rather grounds for exclusion from social occasions.

And now, for those of you who might have misplaced them, marching orders for everyone born before 1980.

1. Remember to write thank-you notes. If you do not know when a thank-you note is appropriate, consult an etiquette book — the older and more hidebound the book, the better. When in doubt, write one anyway; better to err on the side of formality. An email is not sufficient thanks for a physical gift. Purchase stationery and stamps, set aside five minutes, and express your gratitude in writing. Failure to do so implies that you don't care. This implication is a memorable one. Enough said.

2. Do not invite yourself to stay with friends when you travel anymore. Presumably you have a job, and the means to procure yourself a hotel. If so, do so. If not, stay home. Mentioning that you plan a visit to another city may lead to an invitation to stay with a friend or family member, which you may of course accept; assuming that "it's cool if you crash" is not. Wait for the invitation; if it is not forthcoming, this is what we call "a hint," and you should take it and make other arrangements.

3. Do not expect friends to help you move anymore. You may ask for help; you may not expect it, particularly if your move date is on a weekday. Your friends have jobs to go to, and you have accumulated a lot of heavy books by this point in your life. Hire a mover. If you cannot afford a mover, sell your books or put them in storage — or don't move, but one way or another, you will have to cope.

4. Develop a physical awareness of your surroundings. As children, we live in our own heads, bonking into things, gnawing on twigs, emitting random squawks because we don't know how to talk yet. Then, we enter nursery school. You, having graduated college or reached a similar age to that of the college graduate, need to learn to sense others and get out of their way. Walk single file. Don't blather loudly in public spaces. Give up your seat to those with disabilities or who are struggling with small children. Take your headphones off while interacting with clerks and passersby. Do not walk along and then stop suddenly. It is not just you on the street; account for that fact.

5. Be on time. The occasional public-transit snafu is forgivable, but consistent lateness is rude, annoying, and self-centered. If we didn't care when you showed up, we'd have said "any old time"; if we said seven, get there at seven or within fifteen minutes. Do not ditz that you "lost track of time" as though time somehow slipped its leash and ran into traffic. It shows a basic lack of respect for others; flakiness is not cute anymore, primarily because it never was. Buy a watch, wind it up, and wear it everywhere you go.

6. Have enough money. I do not mean "give up your scholarly dreams and join the world of corporate finance in order to keep up with the Joneses." I mean that you should not become that girl or boy who is always a few dollars short, can only cover exactly his or her meal but no tip, or "forgot" to go to the ATM. Go to the ATM first, don't order things you can't afford, and…

7. Know how to calculate the tip. Ten percent of the total; double it; done. You did not have to major in math to know how this works. You are not dumb, but your Barbie-math-is-hard flailing is agonizing and has outstayed its welcome. Ten percent times two. Learn it.

8. Do not share the crazy dream you had last night with anyone but your mental wellness professional. Nobody cares. People who starred in the dream may care, but confine your synopsis to ten words or fewer.

9. Learn to walk in heels. Gentlemen, you are at your leisure. Ladies: If you wear heels, know how to operate them. Clomping along and placing your foot down flat with each step gives the appearance of a ten-year-old playing dress-up, but a pair of heels is like a bicycle — you need momentum to stay up. Come down on the heel and carry forward through the toe, using your regular stride. If you feel wobbly, keep practicing, or get a pair that's better suited to your style of walking. It isn't a once-a-year prom thing anymore for a lot of you, so please learn to walk in them. <--- I guess the equivalent to that would be: know how to press your slacks and tie your tie (but i refuse to do either really).

10. Have at least one good dress-up outfit. A dress code, or suggested attire on an invitation, is not an instrument of The Man. Own one nice dress, or one reasonable suit, or one sharp pair of pants and chic sweater — something you can clean up nice in for a wedding or a semi-formal dinner. You don't have to like it, but if the invitation requests it, put it on. Every night can't be poker night. Which reminds me…

11. Do as invitations ask you. Don't bring a guest when no such courtesy is extended. Don't blow off an RSVP; it means "please respond," and you should. "Regrets only" means you only answer if you can't come. If the party starts at eight, show up at eight — not at seven-thirty so you can go a "better" party later, not at eleven when dinner is cold. Eight. Cocktail parties allow for leeway, of course, but pay attention and read instructions; your host furnished the details for a reason.

12. Know how. Know how to drive. Know how to read a map. Know how to get around. Know how to change a tire, or whom to call if you can't manage it, or how to get to a phone if you don't have a cell phone. We will happily bail you out, until it becomes apparent that it's what you always need. The possibility of a fingernail breaking or a hairstyle becoming compromised is not grounds for purposeful helplessness.

13. Don't use your friends. It's soulless. It's also obvious. If the only reason you continue to associate with a person is to borrow his or her car, might I remind you that you have now turned 25 and may rent your own.

14. Have something to talk about besides college or your job. College is over. The war stories have their amusements, but not over and over and not at every gathering. Get a library card, go to the movies, participate in the world. Working is not living. Be interested so that you can be interesting.

15. Give and receive favors graciously. If you have agreed to do a favor, you may not 1) remind the favoree ceaselessly about how great a pain it is for you, or 2) half-ass it because the favoree "owes you." It is a favor; it is not required, and if you cannot do it, say so. If you can do it, pretend that nobody is watching, do it as best you can, and let that be the end of it. Conversely, if you ask for a favor and the askee cannot do it, do not get snappish. You can manage.

16. Drinking until you throw up is no longer properly a point of pride. It happens to the best of us, but be properly ashamed the next day; work on your tolerance, or eat something first, but amateur hour ended several years hence.

17. Have a real trash receptacle, real Kleenex, and, if you smoke, a real ashtray. No loose bags on the floor; no using a roll of toilet paper; no plates or empty soda cans. You are not a fierce warrior nomad of the Fratty Bubelatty tribe. Buy a wastebasket and grown-up paper products.

18. Universal quiet hours do in fact apply to you. They are, generally, as follows — midnight to six AM on weekdays, 2 AM to 8 AM on weekends. Mine is a fairly generous interpretation, by the by, so bass practice should conclude, not start, at ten PM. Understand also that just because nobody has complained directly to you does not mean that a complaint is not justified, or pending. Further, get your speakers off the floor. Yes, "now." Yes, a rug is still "the floor."

19. Take care of yourself. If you are sick, visit a doctor. If you are sad, visit a shrink or talk to a friend. If you are unhappy in love, break up. If you are fed up with how you look, buy a new shirt or stop eating cheese. If you have a problem, try to fix it. Many problems are knotty and need a lot of talking through, or time to resolve, but after a few months of all complaining and no fixing, those around you will begin to wonder if you don't enjoy the problems for the attention they bring you. Venting is fine; inertia coupled with pouting is not. Bored? Read a magazine. Mad at someone? Say so — to them. Change is hard; that's too bad. Effort counts. Make one. Your mommy's shift is over.

20. Rudeness is not a signifier of your importance. Rudeness is a signifier of itself, nothing more. We all have bad days; yours is not weightier than anyone else's, comparatively, and does not excuse displays of poor breeding. Be civil or be elsewhere.

Thursday, July 23, 2009

Religous Leader on Gay Marriage

A quick statement in regards to the religious freedoms of America, current political tactics and gay rights in a Wisconsin Ballot initiative:

Quaker statement on gay marriage:
By DAVE CHAKOIAN | Viroqua, Wis.

On November’s ballot, Wisconsin will vote on a constitutional ban on same-gender marriages. We of Religious Society of Friends believe the movement to isolate and scapegoat homosexuals, to promote hatred against them, and to impose in law one group’s religious beliefs on us all, is blatantly immoral and contrary to Jesus’ teachings.

With half of marriages ending in divorce, unquestionably the right thing to do is to strengthen marriages. But diverting the question to whether two people of the same sex can have legal rights together completely loses track of the problem of frail marriages.
The proposed constitutional amendment really has nothing to do with marriage; it is a thinly veiled attack on gays and lesbians, part of a pattern of discrimination and institutionalized hatred. It is a strategy of power practiced by would-be tyrants throughout history.

Some have portrayed persecution and hatred of gays as a Christian thing to do. We can find nowhere that Jesus said anything about homosexuality. Nor did Jesus ever suggest encoding Christian teachings into a Sharia-like law to force religious beliefs on society.

We believe that God loves us all equally, and that we are called to treat each other with the same love in which God created us. We have no need to hate, or to discriminate against, any group for any reason. It is simply not Christian to do so.

David Chakoian is clerk of the Kickapoo Valley Monthly Meeting, Religious Society of Friends (Quaker).

Click here for story: http://www.lacrossetribune.com/articles/2006/10/20/opinion/letters/04letter20.txt
.

Wednesday, July 22, 2009

Ultimate Comparison - USA-Z vs. Korea's Game

I heard the ultimate comparison, this morning NPR show influenced by Spencer Ackerman's theory international climate infused with the rap community. Two VERY interesting perceptions juxtaposed, putting Jay-Z as a counter-revolutionary actor which placed "D.O.A." at the center of the story (though I like the Game a lot more than he does).


Some of the greatest minds in national security have turned their attention to a classic problem: When there is one dominant power, the rest of the world tries to challenge it. That's what happened to Britain in the 19th century and to the United States today. The same thing is happening in the world of rap. Currently, we're in a uni-polar world with the United States on top. In the rap world, Jay-Z is that guy.

Here the interview here:
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=106857447

See the after thoughts here:
http://lynch.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2009/07/22/the_realest_stuff_i_ever_wrote

The clash is between established rapper Jay-Z and and up-and-comer known as The Game. Jay-Z has been attacking other rappers for using Auto-Tune software, which corrects pitch while singers record. Auto-Tune is widely used in the industry, but Jay-Z is making a call for authenticity [….] The Game, sezing his chance to take away from Jay after a controversial, is a erratic wildcard. "He's North Korea; he's Iran," Lynch says. "He might not win, but he can hurt you if he drags you down into this extended occupation, this extended counterinsurgency campaign."



“There's a lot more I could have said -- the Nas vs Jay-Z history lesson, the nature and depth of Jay-Z's hegemony, Game's strategic mistakes like insulting Kanye when he should be wooing him, the difficulty of coding cases (amazingly, some people refuse to admit that Nas won his beef with Jay-Z or that the Game defeated G-Unit and 50 Cent.. it's like coding Russia as a winner of World War One or something) -- but you can only do so much in 8 minutes!”

The one point which I do wish I had developed more in the on-air interview, though, is the reason why rap beefs are about soft power and not hard power. Soft power is the ability to obtain what you want through co-option and attraction. It is in contradistinction to 'hard power', which is the use of coercion and payment. And correlations to Topac and Biggie and WWII.