Wednesday, December 09, 2009

Quote from Daily Kos-

Here is some behavioral semantics to invoke powerful political responces, just guess you they are in relation too...

  • A "Homeland" and all the imagery connected to it (also prominently featured in patriotic songs) Invocation of patriotism, of which there is supposedly never enough
  • Glorification of the military while regarding actual soldiers as disposable
  • Glorification of motherhood with ulterior motives (the Lebensborn movement got started with homes for unwed mothers to prevent abortions)
  • "We" are the good guys, not because of what we do (or don't do) but because we say so - "We" are superior at anything and everything, again because we say so
  • Discrimination against a particular minority is morally justified to preserve national security
  • Even though racism and gender discrimination are considered morally right, ideology supersedes racial, ethnic, or gender affiliation. Minority members are tolerated ("We decide who's a Jew") and women can have careers if they are useful to the party
  • A crime or injustice was committed against us, so we must punish somebody, whether they had anything to do with it or not
  • If we lose a war, it's the left-wing traitors' fault
  • Everybody else is out to get us, and we must get them first - Messed up grammar and nonsensical sentence structures interrupted by bumper sticker-style slogans.

...Fox News.

Tuesday, November 24, 2009

Wednesday, September 09, 2009

One of my all time favorit movie is getting a part 2

...And I think I already hate it. This is one of my beloved personal classics. Its philosophical, entertaining, funny, shocking, well written and impeccably acted. This second installment looks seriously lame, they got rid of 2 of the most pimp characters and replaced one of with some chick who visibly does not have the acting chops for the role. Even in the selected scenes for the trailer she lacks the intensity of others and seems to do more imitating (poorly) than acting. And she's not that hot, not that it really matters. The film itself looks glossy and immature, like another shitty Crank sequel. Have a sad and tortured look for yourself:



I mean who really watched this taint-linking, scrod-infested, shit-piece:

Wednesday, August 19, 2009

I am not saying I am for Universal Health Care But...

You didn't get mad when the Supreme Court stopped a legal recount and appointed a President.

You didn't get mad when Cheney allowed Energy company officials to dictate their own energy policy.

You didn't get mad when a covert CIA operative got outed and our own government allowed a leak.

You didn't get mad when the Patriot Act got passed.

You didn't get mad when we put our servicemen and women in harm and illegally invaded a country that posed no threat to us.

You didn't get mad when we spent over 600 billion(and counting) on said illegal war.

You didn't get mad when over 10 billion dollars just disappeared in Iraq.

You didn't get mad when you saw the Abu Grahib photos.

You didn't get mad when you found out we were torturing people.

You didn't get mad when the government was illegally wiretapping us and violating Americans.

You didn't get mad when we didn't catch Bin Laden.

You didn't get mad when you saw the horrible conditions at Walter Reed.

You didn't get mad when we let a major US city drown.

You didn't get mad when the deficit hit the trillion dollar mark.

You finally got mad when.. when... wait for it... when the government decided that people in America deserved to see a doctor if they are sick. That they will ends Discrimination for Pre-Existing Conditions. That they will end how much you can legally charge for out of pocket expenses, or ends Dropping of Coverage for Seriously Ill and ends your Lifetime Cap. Yes, illegal wars, lies, corruption, torture, stealing your tax dollars to make the rich richer, are all ok with you but helping other Americans... well fuck that. That about right? You know it is.

You people have all lost your fucking minds. You are selfish, greedy, obnoxious, narcissistic, and frankly... stupid. Your pathetic little misspelled protest signs are embarrassing. Maybe you ought to find the smart person in your midst and let them make up all the signs, cause man, you look like a bunch of idiots. Also you're ugly and your mother dresses you funny.

Wednesday, July 29, 2009

For Those 25 And Over

I fond this on another blog: If you have reached the age of 25, I have a bit of bad news for you: it is time, if you have not already done so, for you to emerge from your cocoon of post-adolescent dithering and self-absorption and join the rest of us in the world. Past the quarter-century mark, you see, certain actions, attitudes, and behaviors will simply no longer do, and while it might seem unpleasant to feign a maturity and solicitousness towards others that you may not genuinely feel, it is not only appreciated by others but necessary for your continued survival. Continuing to insist past that point that good manners, thoughtfulness, and grooming oppress you in some way is inappropriate and irritating.

Grow up.

And when I instruct you to grow up, I do not mean that you must read up on mortgage rates, put aside candy necklaces, or desist from substituting the word "poo" for crucial syllables of movie titles. Silliness is not only still permitted but actively encouraged. You must, however, stop viewing carelessness, tardiness, helplessness, or any other quality better suited to a child as either charming or somehow beyond your control. A certain grace period for the development of basic consideration and self-sufficiency is assumed, but once you have turned 25, the grace period is over, and starring in a film in your head in which you walk the earth alone is no longer considered a valid lifestyle choice, but rather grounds for exclusion from social occasions.

And now, for those of you who might have misplaced them, marching orders for everyone born before 1980.

1. Remember to write thank-you notes. If you do not know when a thank-you note is appropriate, consult an etiquette book — the older and more hidebound the book, the better. When in doubt, write one anyway; better to err on the side of formality. An email is not sufficient thanks for a physical gift. Purchase stationery and stamps, set aside five minutes, and express your gratitude in writing. Failure to do so implies that you don't care. This implication is a memorable one. Enough said.

2. Do not invite yourself to stay with friends when you travel anymore. Presumably you have a job, and the means to procure yourself a hotel. If so, do so. If not, stay home. Mentioning that you plan a visit to another city may lead to an invitation to stay with a friend or family member, which you may of course accept; assuming that "it's cool if you crash" is not. Wait for the invitation; if it is not forthcoming, this is what we call "a hint," and you should take it and make other arrangements.

3. Do not expect friends to help you move anymore. You may ask for help; you may not expect it, particularly if your move date is on a weekday. Your friends have jobs to go to, and you have accumulated a lot of heavy books by this point in your life. Hire a mover. If you cannot afford a mover, sell your books or put them in storage — or don't move, but one way or another, you will have to cope.

4. Develop a physical awareness of your surroundings. As children, we live in our own heads, bonking into things, gnawing on twigs, emitting random squawks because we don't know how to talk yet. Then, we enter nursery school. You, having graduated college or reached a similar age to that of the college graduate, need to learn to sense others and get out of their way. Walk single file. Don't blather loudly in public spaces. Give up your seat to those with disabilities or who are struggling with small children. Take your headphones off while interacting with clerks and passersby. Do not walk along and then stop suddenly. It is not just you on the street; account for that fact.

5. Be on time. The occasional public-transit snafu is forgivable, but consistent lateness is rude, annoying, and self-centered. If we didn't care when you showed up, we'd have said "any old time"; if we said seven, get there at seven or within fifteen minutes. Do not ditz that you "lost track of time" as though time somehow slipped its leash and ran into traffic. It shows a basic lack of respect for others; flakiness is not cute anymore, primarily because it never was. Buy a watch, wind it up, and wear it everywhere you go.

6. Have enough money. I do not mean "give up your scholarly dreams and join the world of corporate finance in order to keep up with the Joneses." I mean that you should not become that girl or boy who is always a few dollars short, can only cover exactly his or her meal but no tip, or "forgot" to go to the ATM. Go to the ATM first, don't order things you can't afford, and…

7. Know how to calculate the tip. Ten percent of the total; double it; done. You did not have to major in math to know how this works. You are not dumb, but your Barbie-math-is-hard flailing is agonizing and has outstayed its welcome. Ten percent times two. Learn it.

8. Do not share the crazy dream you had last night with anyone but your mental wellness professional. Nobody cares. People who starred in the dream may care, but confine your synopsis to ten words or fewer.

9. Learn to walk in heels. Gentlemen, you are at your leisure. Ladies: If you wear heels, know how to operate them. Clomping along and placing your foot down flat with each step gives the appearance of a ten-year-old playing dress-up, but a pair of heels is like a bicycle — you need momentum to stay up. Come down on the heel and carry forward through the toe, using your regular stride. If you feel wobbly, keep practicing, or get a pair that's better suited to your style of walking. It isn't a once-a-year prom thing anymore for a lot of you, so please learn to walk in them. <--- I guess the equivalent to that would be: know how to press your slacks and tie your tie (but i refuse to do either really).

10. Have at least one good dress-up outfit. A dress code, or suggested attire on an invitation, is not an instrument of The Man. Own one nice dress, or one reasonable suit, or one sharp pair of pants and chic sweater — something you can clean up nice in for a wedding or a semi-formal dinner. You don't have to like it, but if the invitation requests it, put it on. Every night can't be poker night. Which reminds me…

11. Do as invitations ask you. Don't bring a guest when no such courtesy is extended. Don't blow off an RSVP; it means "please respond," and you should. "Regrets only" means you only answer if you can't come. If the party starts at eight, show up at eight — not at seven-thirty so you can go a "better" party later, not at eleven when dinner is cold. Eight. Cocktail parties allow for leeway, of course, but pay attention and read instructions; your host furnished the details for a reason.

12. Know how. Know how to drive. Know how to read a map. Know how to get around. Know how to change a tire, or whom to call if you can't manage it, or how to get to a phone if you don't have a cell phone. We will happily bail you out, until it becomes apparent that it's what you always need. The possibility of a fingernail breaking or a hairstyle becoming compromised is not grounds for purposeful helplessness.

13. Don't use your friends. It's soulless. It's also obvious. If the only reason you continue to associate with a person is to borrow his or her car, might I remind you that you have now turned 25 and may rent your own.

14. Have something to talk about besides college or your job. College is over. The war stories have their amusements, but not over and over and not at every gathering. Get a library card, go to the movies, participate in the world. Working is not living. Be interested so that you can be interesting.

15. Give and receive favors graciously. If you have agreed to do a favor, you may not 1) remind the favoree ceaselessly about how great a pain it is for you, or 2) half-ass it because the favoree "owes you." It is a favor; it is not required, and if you cannot do it, say so. If you can do it, pretend that nobody is watching, do it as best you can, and let that be the end of it. Conversely, if you ask for a favor and the askee cannot do it, do not get snappish. You can manage.

16. Drinking until you throw up is no longer properly a point of pride. It happens to the best of us, but be properly ashamed the next day; work on your tolerance, or eat something first, but amateur hour ended several years hence.

17. Have a real trash receptacle, real Kleenex, and, if you smoke, a real ashtray. No loose bags on the floor; no using a roll of toilet paper; no plates or empty soda cans. You are not a fierce warrior nomad of the Fratty Bubelatty tribe. Buy a wastebasket and grown-up paper products.

18. Universal quiet hours do in fact apply to you. They are, generally, as follows — midnight to six AM on weekdays, 2 AM to 8 AM on weekends. Mine is a fairly generous interpretation, by the by, so bass practice should conclude, not start, at ten PM. Understand also that just because nobody has complained directly to you does not mean that a complaint is not justified, or pending. Further, get your speakers off the floor. Yes, "now." Yes, a rug is still "the floor."

19. Take care of yourself. If you are sick, visit a doctor. If you are sad, visit a shrink or talk to a friend. If you are unhappy in love, break up. If you are fed up with how you look, buy a new shirt or stop eating cheese. If you have a problem, try to fix it. Many problems are knotty and need a lot of talking through, or time to resolve, but after a few months of all complaining and no fixing, those around you will begin to wonder if you don't enjoy the problems for the attention they bring you. Venting is fine; inertia coupled with pouting is not. Bored? Read a magazine. Mad at someone? Say so — to them. Change is hard; that's too bad. Effort counts. Make one. Your mommy's shift is over.

20. Rudeness is not a signifier of your importance. Rudeness is a signifier of itself, nothing more. We all have bad days; yours is not weightier than anyone else's, comparatively, and does not excuse displays of poor breeding. Be civil or be elsewhere.

Thursday, July 23, 2009

Religous Leader on Gay Marriage

A quick statement in regards to the religious freedoms of America, current political tactics and gay rights in a Wisconsin Ballot initiative:

Quaker statement on gay marriage:
By DAVE CHAKOIAN | Viroqua, Wis.

On November’s ballot, Wisconsin will vote on a constitutional ban on same-gender marriages. We of Religious Society of Friends believe the movement to isolate and scapegoat homosexuals, to promote hatred against them, and to impose in law one group’s religious beliefs on us all, is blatantly immoral and contrary to Jesus’ teachings.

With half of marriages ending in divorce, unquestionably the right thing to do is to strengthen marriages. But diverting the question to whether two people of the same sex can have legal rights together completely loses track of the problem of frail marriages.
The proposed constitutional amendment really has nothing to do with marriage; it is a thinly veiled attack on gays and lesbians, part of a pattern of discrimination and institutionalized hatred. It is a strategy of power practiced by would-be tyrants throughout history.

Some have portrayed persecution and hatred of gays as a Christian thing to do. We can find nowhere that Jesus said anything about homosexuality. Nor did Jesus ever suggest encoding Christian teachings into a Sharia-like law to force religious beliefs on society.

We believe that God loves us all equally, and that we are called to treat each other with the same love in which God created us. We have no need to hate, or to discriminate against, any group for any reason. It is simply not Christian to do so.

David Chakoian is clerk of the Kickapoo Valley Monthly Meeting, Religious Society of Friends (Quaker).

Click here for story: http://www.lacrossetribune.com/articles/2006/10/20/opinion/letters/04letter20.txt
.

Wednesday, July 22, 2009

Ultimate Comparison - USA-Z vs. Korea's Game

I heard the ultimate comparison, this morning NPR show influenced by Spencer Ackerman's theory international climate infused with the rap community. Two VERY interesting perceptions juxtaposed, putting Jay-Z as a counter-revolutionary actor which placed "D.O.A." at the center of the story (though I like the Game a lot more than he does).


Some of the greatest minds in national security have turned their attention to a classic problem: When there is one dominant power, the rest of the world tries to challenge it. That's what happened to Britain in the 19th century and to the United States today. The same thing is happening in the world of rap. Currently, we're in a uni-polar world with the United States on top. In the rap world, Jay-Z is that guy.

Here the interview here:
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=106857447

See the after thoughts here:
http://lynch.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2009/07/22/the_realest_stuff_i_ever_wrote

The clash is between established rapper Jay-Z and and up-and-comer known as The Game. Jay-Z has been attacking other rappers for using Auto-Tune software, which corrects pitch while singers record. Auto-Tune is widely used in the industry, but Jay-Z is making a call for authenticity [….] The Game, sezing his chance to take away from Jay after a controversial, is a erratic wildcard. "He's North Korea; he's Iran," Lynch says. "He might not win, but he can hurt you if he drags you down into this extended occupation, this extended counterinsurgency campaign."



“There's a lot more I could have said -- the Nas vs Jay-Z history lesson, the nature and depth of Jay-Z's hegemony, Game's strategic mistakes like insulting Kanye when he should be wooing him, the difficulty of coding cases (amazingly, some people refuse to admit that Nas won his beef with Jay-Z or that the Game defeated G-Unit and 50 Cent.. it's like coding Russia as a winner of World War One or something) -- but you can only do so much in 8 minutes!”

The one point which I do wish I had developed more in the on-air interview, though, is the reason why rap beefs are about soft power and not hard power. Soft power is the ability to obtain what you want through co-option and attraction. It is in contradistinction to 'hard power', which is the use of coercion and payment. And correlations to Topac and Biggie and WWII.

Tuesday, July 21, 2009

Same-Couples Dancing Lessons.... Cute



I have hear the the first Tango was developed for two men, just and interesting piece of information.

Sterilizing Sarah’s Speech: Vanity Fair Editor and Fact-Checking Dpt. Review Palin’s Address

If you watched Sarah Palin’s resignation speech, you know one thing: her high-priced speechwriters moved back to the Beltway long ago. Just how poorly constructed was the governor’s holiday-weekend address? We asked V.F.’s red-pencil-wielding executive literary editor, Wayne Lawson, together with representatives from the research and copy departments, to whip it into publishable shape. Here is the colorful result.


See the rest here.


Friday, July 17, 2009

Monday, June 29, 2009

Popular Poerty: ONE MOMENT IN TIME

Each day I live I want to be
A day to give the best of me
I'm only one, But not alone
My finest day is yet unknown

I broke my heart
Fought every gain
To taste the sweet
I face the pain
I rise and fall
Yet through it all
This much remains

I want one moment in time
When I'm more than I thought I could be
When all of my dreams are a heartbeat away
And the answers are all up to me
Give me one moment in time
When I'm racing with destiny
Then in that one moment of time
I will feel
I will feel eternity

I've lived to be
The very best
I want it all
No time for less
I've laid the plans
Now lay the chance
Here in my hands

Give me one moment in time
When I'm more than I thought I could be
When all of my dreams are a heartbeat away
And the answers are all up to me
Give me one moment in time
When I'm racing with destiny
Then in that one moment of time
I will feel
I will feel eternity

Wednesday, June 24, 2009

HCwDB: Perez you are a pastiche ... a dim echo of 1980s

Dear Perez Hilton:

You are Warholian superstar pastiche without the self awareness. You are dim echo of 1980s gay counterculture, reprocessed and defanged as a slightly edgier version of the typical host on "E!" You make Michael Musto look like Oscar Wilde.

Take your blank page and fill it with the latest starlet drama. Repeat it enough times and the noise will be loud and fame enhanced. But it's simply a feedback loop of white-noise douchosity. Clown.

Now get off my internets and go back to penis drawing.

-From HotChicksWithDouchebags.com, greater words have never been spoken.

Tuesday, June 23, 2009

HAARM: Healthy Americans Against Reforming Medicine

You have to check out this mock PAC site, it's hilarious, but it also uses a clever method to debunk false and misleading statements. The parody pokes at an inept conservative media and some of the arguments the media has used. good times:

http://haarm.org/


Thursday, June 18, 2009

National Security Cartoon

What, are you anti-America or something

Wednesday, June 17, 2009

Bible quote of the Day

"Let a woman learn in silence with all submission. And I do not permit a woman to teach or to have authority over a man, but to be in silence."
~1 Timothy 2:11-12

"Let your women keep silent in the churches, for they are not permitted to speak; but they are to be submissive, as the law also says."
~1 Corinthians 14:34

Friday, June 12, 2009

Dealing with Designers got you Stressed!



Howdy, long time no talk.

I am going to let y’all in on a little thing that I don’t commonly do. I am going to talk about me and my life. Usually, I post my reaction or reviews, or articles and videos done by others. But I got to vent :- ) (the initial point of the blog).
I am so worried about my job, I am not sure if they are dissolving my position or if they are going to contract me out to another company. I’m seriously worried about my position. And I am worried about my metal stability (would out sourcing be so bad?). I am getting irritated far too easily. As a designer and previously journalist, I have thick skin. I thought I had a very thick skin, between my past working in city government and leading the production on the area news paper, I have come to understand and learn criticisms, bureaucracy and stress of a time crunch by loosing hundreds of thousands of dollars on an almost impossible deadline… but right now, these peeps are driving me nuts.

Things for office etiquette- 1) be polite, especially with critiques. Its just good human nature and a little bit can go a long way. 2) Stay mature, as a early 20-something-year-old I should not have to tell a senior official to “grow up.” Working as a concierge at a business hotel, I find so many business travelers childish, rude, inconsiderate, self-indulgent and plain silly. Emails and posts that are equivalent to a 13-year-old girl’s texts are not a sign of running a company well. 3) keep your nose out of others’ business if it doesn’t apply to you or your concern, reading other’s computer screens is rude, critiques on a design not done is not constructive, particularly when you are not a designer. 4) Hold your temper- this on is for me… lord, I am trying. 5) Put yourself in others shoes don’t blare crappy glam metal hits from the 80s, it ruins others work momentum, I don’t blare my Coldplay. (BONUS: Don’t interrupt, this is extremely disrespectful especially if it is a repeat offender).


Designs are important, they elect new presidents, change social opinion, get you to buy a double beacon mushroom burger at midnight and sell billions of CDs for a singer that can not sing.

Here is a short list for Professionals dealing with Designers. 1) Do your job before- get them the information upfront and finished. If the text changes so does the balance of the design. Its not the designers job to proof read (if you haven’t notices I CAN NOT spell) 2) Trust the designer, they understand the Golden ratio, how to align, things to watch out for, complimenting colors and how to draw the eye deeper and deeper into the ad (i.e. it is a sign of a bad designer if everything is centered). Have actual critiques- “hmm, I don’t know, I just don’t like the background” … “ok.” Not helpful. This might take a little thought, but it is important, what specifically don’t you like about the “background” the color, the gradient, symbol ect. AND come up with alternatives (yeas, plural to alternative), if you can’t come up with any… maybe it should be left OR the “background” isn’t really the problem. Discuss the alternativeS, get his professional opinion, and allow him to critique suggestions and vice versa. This is how you get to the bottom of a good design. 3) Be organized; don’t send a fleet of emails and contradicting messages and one update after another “oh not the last on but this one”. Be relevant, clean and concise (like your ad/design should be). 4) Be polite, be nice but firm, understanding and demanding. Its not a designs job to rip you off (put some clip art on a word doc and call it an online ad). Let them work, get updates, keep invilved and make sure they are keeping you informed. 5) You contribution you deadline. Deadlines are important to hit, but if you give them and important piece of text the day before deadline… your not getting a quality or even finished ad.
(BONUS: do your research before hiring your designer. Make sure to look at their work and style, does it mesh with the aesthetic of your business clientele (and NOT your personal taste (i.e. Its great that you like the color blue… but that wont sell you hamburgers). Research and interview, all designers will have a book of previous work, this will help avoid creative differences later down the line).

Ahhhhhh…, *relief* Thanks for the intimate read.

Friday, May 29, 2009

A man who left christianity

Found this on a blog, it was interesting and so simplified yet still all-inclusive and thought out. I will neither endorse or condemn his opinion, nor will i say it is my own personal viewpoint. However, i will say it is interesting, well written and for Catholics, this is the creed you will have to battle against both internally and across society. I would like to point out 2 things, he doesn't denounce God per say just "the God of the Bible" (what has been written about said God). His grips tend to be about literal believers of the text too. Most Catholics don't believe in word-for-word translation nor is that endorsed by the papacy (the bible is a religious truth not historical truth-http://www.dula.tv/watch.php?file=if-atheists-ruled-the-world.flv). But this serves as a strong contender in logic vs faith arguments.

"For those wondering, here is a condensed “Top 20 List” of the things that led to my rejection of Christianity.

  1. God is wrathful, jealous, hateful, and kills nations of people like it is a bodily function. He is certainly not just or “holy” in nature.
  2. The act of throwing people into infinite torture and punishment for not believing a Jewish guy from 2,000 years ago was God’s son, or unknowingly worshiping the wrong god, is extremely cruel and sadistic.
  3. The statements, “God works in mysterious ways,” or “It will all make sense in heaven,” are little more than irrational cop outs. This God allows horrible atrocities to be committed against innocent men, women and children every day.
  4. Bloody animal and human sacrifices are illogical demands by a divine god as payment for petty wrong doings. These actions are no different than the rituals of archaic pagan religions. Not to mention the bizarre ritual of symbolically drinking human blood and eating human flesh.
  5. If God loves us and wants us to know and believe in him, why be so completely invisible? What is the purpose of being so illusive to those who believe and worship him?
  6. God never manifests himself or performs miracles as he regularly did for the Israelites in Old Testament stories.
  7. Prayers are never answered. Certainly not in the way Jesus described. Prayer has absolutely no affect on the world around us.
  8. Jesus did not fulfill major Old Testament prophesies or even fulfill his own promises and predictions.
  9. The authors of much of the Bible are unknown. And of these unknown authors, the men who wrote the gospels likely never even met Jesus considering they were written 40-70 years after his death. A far cry from reliable testimony.
  10. The Bible is repeatedly contradictory with itself, reality, and the laws of morality. Couldn’t God inspire a less poorly written book?
  11. The Bible is open to interpretation. Everyone interprets it in the way that suits them best or serves their purposes.
  12. Throughout history, Christians have justified horrific actions by the Bible and its teaching.
  13. The Bible promotes hate and persecution against women, homosexuals and those who worship other gods or no god at all.
  14. According to the Bible, nearly 70% percent of the people in the world will burn in hell because they don’t believe Jesus was the son of God.
  15. The only reason I was a Christian was because I was indoctrinated into the religion as a child as a result of the culture and region of the world in which I was born.
  16. Christianity has no more rational or factual foundation than any other religion on earth that I openly reject.
  17. The Christian church is disjointed and can’t even agree with one another.
  18. Christians are not at all ethically or morally different from non-Christians.
  19. Today, powerful church leaders steal, lie and molest young children. The church repeatedly attempts to cover up these atrocities, only to reluctantly apologize as a last resort.
  20. It is absolutely irrational to continue to believe archaic teaching with the amount of knowledge we’ve gained through science and technology. The Bible reads like a book of primitive folklore, not divinely inspired insight into our true reason for existence."

Thursday, May 28, 2009

The "About Me" Section

I'm a modern man, a man for the millennium. Digital and smoke free. A diversified multi-cultural, post-modern deconstruction that is anatomically and ecologically incorrect. I've been up linked and downloaded, I've been inputted and outsourced, I know the upside of downsizing, I know the downside of upgrading. I'm a high-tech low-life. A cutting edge, state-of-the-art bi-coastal multi-tasker and I can give you a gigabyte in a nanosecond! I'm new wave, but I'm old school and my inner child is outward bound. I'm a hot-wired, heat seeking, warm-hearted cool customer, voice activated and bio-degradable. I interface with my database, my database is in cyberspace, so I'm interactive, I'm hyperactive and from time to time I'm radioactive. Behind the eight ball, ahead of the curve, ridin the wave, dodgin the bullet and pushin the envelope. I'm on-point, on-task, on-message and off drugs. I've got no need for coke and speed. I've got no urge to binge and purge. I'm in-the-moment, on-the-edge, over-the-top and under-the-radar. A high-concept, low-profile, medium-range ballistic missionary. A street-wise smart bomb. A top-gun bottom feeder. I wear power ties, I tell power lies, I take power naps and run victory laps. I'm a totally ongoing big-foot, slam-dunk, rainmaker with a pro-active outreach. A raging workaholic. A working rageaholic. Out of rehab and in denial! I've got a personal trainer, a personal shopper, a personal assistant and a personal agenda. You can't shut me up. You can't dumb me down because I'm tireless and I'm wireless, I'm an alpha male on beta-blockers. I'm a non-believer and an over-achiever, laid-back but fashion-forward. Up-front, down-home, low-rent, high-maintenance. Super-sized, long-lasting, high-definition, fast-acting, oven-ready and built-to-last! I'm a hands-on, foot-loose, knee-jerk head case pretty maturely post-traumatic and I've got a love-child that sends me hate mail. But, I'm feeling, I'm caring, I'm healing, I'm sharing-- a supportive, bonding, nurturing primary care-giver. My output is down, but my income is up. I took a short position on the long bond and my revenue stream has its own cash-flow. I read junk mail, I eat junk food, I buy junk bonds and I watch trash sports! I'm gender specific, capital intensive, user-friendly and lactose intolerant. I like rough sex. I like tough love. I use the "F" word in my emails and the software on my hard-drive is hardcore--no soft porn. I bought a microwave at a mini-mall; I bought a mini-van at a mega-store. I eat fast-food in the slow lane. I'm toll-free, bite-sized, ready-to-wear and I come in all sizes. A fully-equipped, factory-authorized, hospital-tested, clinically-proven, scientifically- formulated medical miracle. I've been pre-wash, pre-cooked, pre-heated, pre-screened, pre-approved, pre-packaged, post-dated, freeze-dried, double-wrapped, vacuum-packed and, I have an unlimited broadband capacity. I'm a rude dude, but I'm the real deal. Lean and mean! Cocked, locked and ready-to-rock. Rough, tough and hard to bluff. I take it slow, I go with the flow, I ride with the tide. I've got glide in my stride. Drivin and movin, sailin and spinin, jiving and groovin, wailin and winnin. I don't snooze, so I don't lose. I keep the pedal to the metal and the rubber on the road. I party hearty and lunch time is crunch time. I'm hangin in, there ain't no doubt and I'm hangin tough, over and out!" --George Carlin

Thursday, May 07, 2009

Images of American "Chastity, Faith, and Tradition"


Bristol Palin

Miss. California Prejean

This is a wonderful piece in the Washington Post and asks the questions I have been asking for quit some time. Please read

Under God: Palin, Prejean and Pre-Marital Ambivalence

by David Waters

Unwed, single, teenage mom Bristol Palin was being lauded on talk shows Wednesday -- National Day to Prevent Teen Pregnancy -- for encouraging other teenagers to abstain from sex. Meanwhile, Carrie Prejean (Miss California) was defending her title -- and her advocacy of "traditional marriage" -- because of sensual and revealing photographs taken of her when she was a teenage model.

I'm confused. Are we in favor of teenage sexuality or not? Are we OK using teenagers to model lingerie until they become public figures? Are we not OK with unwed teenage moms until they admit their mistakes on national TV?

I ask because teenage sexuality is one of the leading causes of illegitimacy, which believe it or not is more pandemic than the swine flu and more damaging to the institutions of family and marriage than any same-gender commitment ceremony in California or Iowa.

Why aren't Catholic bishops withholding communion from illegitimate parents? Why are evangelical and black church leaders campaigning for opposite-sex marriage to save the family? Why aren't progressive Christian leaders pushing for more social programs to help children conceived out of wedlock? Why aren't Mormon leaders opposing polygamous relationships (which are common) rather than polygamy (which is not)?

Tuesday, April 28, 2009

Don't Mess With Texas ... Get Rid Of It

This is a brilliant analysis of why the "likely to be the violently xenophobic Republic of Texas" should be able to secede, (along with other 3 fiscally draining states). You think they could take FoxNews with them too?

By David Faris, NPR.org, April 28, 2009 · During the campaign, President Obama talked a good game about bipartisanship. Now he has the perfect opportunity to achieve something that people on both sides of the aisle desperately want: kicking Texas out of the union.

Texas Gov. Rick Perry recently implied that Texas might need to leave the United States if the mean old federal government doesn't stop doing things like sending stimulus money and slightly raising the top marginal tax rates. These things being obvious markers of impending fascism (unlike, say, unsympathetically institutionalizing a global torture regime), Perry thinks it's time to go. Unsurprisingly, a majority of Texas Republicans approved of these remarks.

Texas asking Blue America for a divorce is like a woman asking her boyfriend if he'd like to sit around all day drinking Miller and watching football, or like the Patriots offering Tom Brady to the Redskins for a 19th-round draft pick. Befuddled liberals can only shake their heads in gratified amazement while they pop the cap on their first beer, settle into the sofa and watch Brady pilot the 'Skins to the Super Bowl.


The transition should be peaceful — no need for 600,000 Americans to die like the last time a state tried to leave the union. These kinds of things are best handled with negotiations — just ask the Czechs and the Slovaks, who dissolved Czechoslovakia like an old married couple who remain great friends but just don't want to sleep together anymore.

  • First, Texas should be given the option of taking neighboring Oklahoma, Alabama and Louisiana with them. These states are reliably deep red, and are also three of the biggest tax drains in the country, raking in federal dollars while kvetching about Obama's tyranny. In return, the U.S. gets to keep the liberal oasis of Austin, like the little swath of Azerbaijan surrounded by Armenia and Iran.
  • Second, Texas Rangers outfielder Josh Hamilton should immediately be seized by the Washington Nationals as part of the deal. The Washington Wizards should also demand star San Antonio point guard Tony Parker, who is French and therefore probably unwelcome in what is likely to be the violently xenophobic Republic of Texas. The U.S. would, of course, have to cough up some native Texans, like Houston Astros meatballer Brandon Backe.
  • Finally, the Republic of Texas should arrange a population transfer with the United States, like how Turkey and Greece exchanged all their misplaced Turks and Greeks after the first World War — only this time without the forced marches and famine. Basically, we get all the New Yorker-reading lefties, and Texas can have all the crazies — millenarians with basement stockpiles of semiautomatics, true believers who blockade abortion clinics, paranoiacs who think The Gays are coming to get them, and anyone who believes that evolution is "just a theory."


Getting rid of Texas is a once-a-century opportunity for America's new leader. Texas Republicans have spoken. The only question is, "Are you listening President Obama?"

David Faris recently completed the 27th grade at the University of Pennsylvania, where he studies Middle East politics. He looks forward to adding another rogue state to his passport when he visits the Republic of Texas.

Monday, April 27, 2009

Some random Lifetime clip

I know, life time is cheesy. But if you look past that i am sure you can find similarities that most people have gone through. Personally, my mom wouldn't be the antagonist (as far as the gay thing goes i would discriber her as: convientently judgemental, religous, stanchly republican, appropiately concered yet hasnt really put much thought into the "gay thing" and generally isn't in her plane of thought). Though if i had a Lifetime movie i would totally put Sigourney Weaver in her roll.

Tuesday, April 21, 2009

Trial and Tribulations of being just Pretty

Here is the best of MISS USA PAGEANT: I was inspired by Miss California 2009 to put together a little countdown after her incoherent answer, which stumbled and fell to a conclusion after a painful logical crawl and yet, she was still remarkably high ranked. I cant believe pageants are still around to be honest, to me it seems obvious its more about the sparkles you can load onto a dress and less about inner beauty, intellect or poise.


Miss Americas Fall from Grace


California- "Ummmm, opposite marriage" 
(Please Gay men and women, have dignity and take yourselves out out this field, or at least away from Miss California.)

Sum it up What-the-Buck



All time favorite: "like such as"

Thursday, April 16, 2009

Equal Marriage for NY

AP: NEW YORK – Gov. David Paterson announced plans Thursday to legalize same-sex marriage in New York, making a political gamble that he can ride the momentum of other states that have recently allowed the practice.

The governor's approval ratings have plunged to below 20 percent, and it's still unclear how the legislation will play in the state. Paterson says gay marriage is a crucial issue of equal rights in America that cannot be ignored.

Paterson, who is black, framed the issue in sweeping terms, invoking Frederick Douglass and Harriet Beecher Stowe and drawing a parallel between the fight to eliminate slavery in the 1800s to the current effort to allow gay marriage.



"I'm introducing a bill to bring marriage equality to the state of New York," Paterson said to applause, surrounded by leaders including Mayor Michael Bloomberg and City Council Speaker Christine Quinn.

The proposal is the same bill the Democrat-controlled state Assembly passed in 2007 before it died in the Senate, where the Republican majority kept it from going to a vote. Democrats now control the Senate, but opponents are vowing to make sure this one fails, as well.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090416/ap_on_re_us/gay_marriage_new_york

Wednesday, April 15, 2009

Popular. You gonna be Popular

Centuries of obsession: It takes looks, personality, and ... well, thats it. Jee golly, if only i had brains i could probably think of other influences, what could it be hmm.


Picture Show: Scott Strazzante & Robert Adams

Both of these photographers were published in NPR this week. The first i loved because it took me back to the family farm in Texas and later into my ivory suburban childhood. Its called Common Ground:



On July 2, 2002, Jean and Harlow Cagwin watched as their home — the last remnant of their 118-acre cattle farm in Lockport, Illinois — was torn down clearing the way for a new housing development. Several years later, Ed and Amanda Grabenhofer and their four children moved into, what is now, the new Willow Walk subdivision. This is the work of photographer, Scott Strazzante, for almost over a decade.

http://mediastorm.org/0023.htm



The second is a beautiful and poignant representation of the Midwest personal sprawl and tranquil terrain. I always found the beauty of Nebraska (and its pictures) not in the subject, but the void around it. Photographer, Robert Adams, who recently won the Hasselblad Award, does a great job translating that peaceful emptiness and bland encasing into character.

http://www.npr.org/blogs/pictureshow/2009/04/robert_adams.html

Tuesday, April 14, 2009

Wednesday, April 08, 2009

American Idol's Adam Lambert Ruins Historic Piece of Music

I am sorry, did we already forget how stunning, lingering and evocative Mad World truly is and how it lost ALL meaning.

Can I just say something about this- That song is one of the most brilliant songs written and way before its time and later made infamous by a beautiful, deep, haunting vocals from Gary Jules. Adam blew it he was absolutely undeniable awful and --everyone loved it? I cant believe he got away with such a grisly murder.

Originally written by tears for fears in 1982, the early 80s were incapable sustaining its true musical capacity (performed in an early pop-80’s ‘Tiffany’ sort of way) and it wasn’t truly realized until later versions were released after the grudge era. It is now an Iconic song gracefully looming throughout so many forms of our culture, from Gears of War to Donnie Darko:



The Adam Lambert rendition was a step back for music, why does it sound like he is getting kicked in the balls. It was unnaturally self indulgent, void of meaning and emotion… wow, I mean, that song has power.

I couldn’t believe my ears when I heard it; I was offended as a fan of the song (just check my MySpace page)

That song is beautiful, that song is enduring, that song delivers chills in the first few chords… and that song is not Adam.

Mad Word, Tears for Fears (early conceptual allegro)


Donnie Darko (famous low tempo)


Fuck Face’s (retarded version)

Tuesday, April 07, 2009

Vermont Overrides a Vetoed Gay Marriage Bill! DC Recognizes Out of State Marriage

BREAKING NEWS: Moments ago, the Vermont House voted 100-49 to override the marriage bill veto!

Moments ago, the Vermont House voted 100-49 to override the marriage bill veto! The House vote, which followed the Senate voting 23-5 this morning to override Gov. Douglas’s veto, means that Vermont becomes the first state to OK marriage equality through the legislative process.

Today Vermont joins Massachusetts, Connecticut and Iowa in allowing gay and lesbian couples to legally marry.



Statement by Senate President Pro Tem Peter Shumlin regarding the passage of S. 115 “An Act Relating to Civil Marriage”:

Today Vermont legislators did the right thing by overriding Governor Douglas’ veto and granting equal rights to all Vermonters. The struggle for equal rights is never easy. I was proud to be President of the Senate nine years ago when Vermont led the country by creating civil unions. Today is another historic day for Vermont and I have never felt more proud as we become the first state in the country to enact marriage equality not as the result of a court order, but because it is the right thing to do.”

Many thanks to all the Vermonters who participated in this debate, Vermont Freedom to Marry, MassEquality, the Human Rights Campaign, and everyone who helped make today’s victory possible.

http://www.hrcbackstory.org/2009/04/victory-vermont-votes-for-marriage-equality/

THIS JUST IN: DC Council votes to recognize out-of-state same-sex marriage

The D.C. Council has voted to recognize gay marriages performed in other states on the same day that Vermont became the fourth state to legalize same-sex unions.


Domestic partnerships already are legal in the nation’s capital, and gay couples married in other states are recognized as domestic partners when they move the city. But today’s legislation, billed as an important milestone in gay rights, explicitly recognizes them as married couples.

Obama's Weekend Speech

"We do not consider ourselves a Christian nation, Jewish nation or a Muslim nation, but a nation of citizens." -Barrack Obama

"give to Cesar what is Cesar's, give to God what is God's" -Jesus ... Christians need to study more

Friday, April 03, 2009

Equal Marriage Passes in Iowa: Midwest Paving the Way

I woke to an ecstatic text messages this morning and saw the flurry of Facebook activity. Here is the Washington Post and NY Times stories at 9:00am this morning! :-) :-) :-) :-)


Washington Post: DES MOINES, Iowa -- Iowa's Supreme Court legalized gay marriage Friday in a unanimous and emphatic decision that makes Iowa the third state _ and first in the nation's heartland _ to allow same-sex couples to wed.

In its decision, the high court upheld a lower court's ruling that found a state law restricting marriage to between a man and woman only violated Iowa's constitution.

"It's a big win because, coming from Iowa, it represents the mainstreaming of gay marriage. And it shows that despite attempts stop gay marriage through right-wing ballot initiatives, like in California, the courts will continue to support the case for equal rights for gays,"

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/04/03/AR2009040300376.html?hpid%3Dtopnews⊂=AR

New York Times: DES MOINES — Iowa became the first state in the Midwest to approve same-sex marriage on Friday, after the Iowa Supreme Court unanimously decided that a 1998 law limiting marriage to a man and a woman was unconstitutional.

The decision was the culmination of a four-year legal battle that began in the lower courts. The Supreme Court said same-sex marriages could begin in Iowa in as soon as 21 days.

“I’d like to introduce you to my fiancee,” said Kate Varnum, 34, reaching over to Trish Varnum. “Today I am proud to be a lifelong Iowan.”“We are blessed to live in Iowa,” she added.

The case here was being closely followed by advocates on both sides of the issue. While the same-sex marriage debate has played out on both coasts, the Midwest — where no states had permitted same-sex marriage — was seen as entirely different. In the past, at least six states in the Midwest were among those around the country that adopted amendments to their state constitutions banning same-sex marriage.

“The decision made by the Iowa Supreme Court today to allow gay marriage in Iowa is disappointing on many levels," State Senator Paul McKinley, the Republican leader, said in a statement on The Des Moines Register’s Web site. "I believe marriage should only be between one man and one woman and I am confident the majority of Iowans want traditional marriage to be legally recognized in this state."
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/04/us/04iowa.html?_r=1&hp

Thursday, March 26, 2009

Godly Reflection



“And even if we did have only Christians in our midst, if we expelled every non-Christian from the United States of America, whose Christianity would we teach in the schools? Would we go with James Dobson's, or Al Sharpton's? Which passages of Scripture should guide our public policy? Should we go with Leviticus, which suggests slavery is ok and that eating shellfish is abomination? How about Deuteronomy, which suggests stoning your child if he strays from the faith? Or should we just stick to the Sermon on the Mount - a passage that is so radical that it's doubtful that our own Defense Department would survive its application? -So before we get carried away, let's read our bibles. Folks haven't been reading their bibles.”
— Barack Obama

Wednesday, March 25, 2009

2012 American Economy Armageddon !!!!...?

This guy predicts the economy like I predict politics :-)
"Economic trends foreceaster Gerald Celente bears news nobody wants to hear: the economic crisis is going to get worse." It's a little scary, Gerald Celente is predicting an Economic Armageddon between 2009 - 2012 and, according to himself, has been for some time now.



Concerning? Yes. However, I would like to say that this does seem pretty sensationalized, and the reporters don't seem to show any descending views or intricate background (maybe when he has been wrong, or some loop holes within his theory). They took a lot of what he said for granted. The report should have checked to see if this is what Celente has REALLY been saying for the last few years and "bought the URL," not just taking Celente's word for it. (Notice my "according to himself" in the opening paragaph). This is usually a dead on sign of poor/lazy/rushed journalism or poor, yet sensational, substance. This doesn't necessarily mean this expert is wrong, it just means you should be cautious because we are getting a very limited story (we can't make good decisions without more info). The televised news might have even re-edited it to make what he said seem more dramatic (cutting out sober minded commentary for sensational sound bites because of 'time' or **eh-hum** ratings. Regardless, it is interesting and worrisome-- hopefully it won't come to this.

Thursday, March 19, 2009

Wednesday, March 18, 2009

Stewart vs Cramer: The Complete Guide

The Interview


How did this idea that John Stewart in attacking Crammer for being a 'non-supporter of Obama’s views'? John Stewart- yes, he is a comedian, yes, he is to the left/Dem., yes, his show is not on CNN or FoxNews but on an MTV subsidiary. Yet he has more sense, intellect, research, and value than most other TV Journalists out there. This is not to defend Stewart, the comedian, but condemn the rest of the “ TV journalists.” If anyone was watching before hand, and knew the SLIGHTEST information on this topic, then you would undoubtedly understand where the feud spawned from... and where it did not. I have tracked down ALL the media i could find, make up your own mind.


The Episode that started it all. You try and figure out why John is mad, hmmm?!

What an odd story this was, such drama! It was unique because for the first time I was totally plugged into all facets and saw the whole thing unfold like some bystander watch a ten car media pile up. What has made me so angry is the utter misinformation being supplied by the greater media.

Why i disagree with the assumption that this was a TV assassination attempt aimed at the Republicans
A. He didn't attack Cramer he attacked the whole financial show market
B. Pull up many of Stewart's past criticisms of Obama and his cabinet choices ( far more than Cramer's -if Cramer even has any)
John Stewart criticizes Obama




C. Watch the episode –it clearly explained WHY he is going after him with such ferocity (video at top)
D. The interview obviously pertained to the idea the Cramer's stock choices not his ideologies
E.Look at the facts: (why isn’t that enough-- to ask some serious questions)

-----It was during the March 17, 2008, segment, titled "Broken Arrow: Crisis in the Chartland," Stewart criticized Cramer after airing a clip of CNBC's Mad Money, during which Cramer said:

"Bear Stearns is fine. Do not take your money out.
This is -- look, if there's one takeaway other than a plus 400 [inaudible] --
Bear Stearns is not in trouble. I mean, if anything, they are more likely to be
taken over. Don't move your money from Bear. That's just being silly. Don't be
silly." -----


The only thing that is silly here is it took a comedian to point this out seriously. But it was spun into Stewart (angry, at the obvious, because “this guy is screwing people’s hard earn money over” [and I personally still think he was a little angry over the cancelation]) into a puppet for the liberal elite.



But where did this spin come from? The O’Reilly Factor. (video below)

O’Reilly’s fun house mirror take on the situation


(This is the back story) This is how i cam to accidentally watch the whole thing unfold. In a debate with my parents, I told them I would watch an O’Reilly episode with a pen and paper and make notes of each error covered by the show. Last week, O’Reilly aired a segment (obviously with out having done any type of research before hand) on the Stewart/Crammer story. There he accused Stewart of attacking Cramer for his views on Obama. Ok, A) I can't really find ant decenting remarks made about Obama were in 2008/2009 B) Crammer shies any form partisan topics on his show about finance.
The last criticism of the Obama administration for Stewart: last week. With the debacle of electing a person to head up the IRS with a history of not paying taxes. The reason Stewart was PISSED was because of a finance guy telling people to buy AIG and Bear Sterns the same week it closed. After the last minute cancellation: Comedian + an axe to grind + open air time= legendary comedy.
Bill O’Wrongly, got it wrong… Again. It was wrong to accuse Crammer of partisanship and it was wrong to report conjecture as fact.
My dad and I, my dad being the University Chair of the Finance Dpt. And Republican, had been exchanging emails on this Cramer topic right after the first Stewart episode aired. Both thinking it was funny and my dad was relieved by Stewart’s take on “those finance shows for cads.” Then by chance seeing the O’Reilly Factor –seeing this as my golden opportunity to show my parent’s of how wrong O’Reilly is… and now I get to show how much of a Fox lap-dog Tucker is (BONUS POINTS!) [video above]. Lets be honest here, at least John Stewart admits to being left, its obvious his show leans left.. no ands ifs and buts about it. But tucker can’t even man up and admit he is Right leaning?! Obviously, not the most truthful reporter.

Watch the episode, and see for yourself: is John going after crammer for being Republican or is it for wrongly advising people. Tucker should

This just shows once again how wrong the media is now a days. It hit two no three birds with one stone a) shaming them by doing a better job than the other news personalities b) lack of research, which might be cause the first c) THE STOCK MARKET IS IMPLODING and you report on a TV feud… what is wrong with you guys!
Be your own judge.

Tuesday, March 17, 2009

Best Irish Videos

Mobile, Alabama sees "crack head" leprechaun.

Mmmmm Beer.

The Irish temperament.

Best St. Pat's Day Movie... ever!